You hit publish. The post looks good. Clean. Organized. Hits all the right points.
And nobody reads it.
Not because the topic was bad. Not because you posted at the wrong time. Because the writing sounded like every other piece of content floating around online right now. Polished. Generic. Forgettable.
If you have ever read something you wrote and thought “that doesn't sound like me,” you are not alone. And the problem is more common than most people admit.
The Real Problem With AI Writing Tools
Let's be honest. AI writing tools are useful. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini — all of them can crank out a decent 500-word draft in under a minute. That is genuinely impressive.
But here is what the tool vendors don't tell you.
When everybody uses the same tools, everything starts to sound the same. Same rhythm. Same structure. Same words. Writing that looks right but says nothing real.
AI models were trained on massive amounts of content — corporate blogs, press releases, LinkedIn posts, marketing copy. That content leans heavily on filler language. Words that sound professional without meaning anything specific.
So when AI generates a draft, it reaches for those same words. Not because it is trying to be vague. Because statistically, those words show up everywhere in “professional writing.”
The result is what people now call AI slop. Writing that performs competence without earning trust.
You have read it. Emails that felt cold even though they were “professionally written.” Blog posts that hit all the right SEO boxes but didn't get a single comment. LinkedIn posts that got polite likes from people who clearly skimmed them.
That is the voice problem.
What AI Slop Actually Looks Like
You will recognize these the second you see them.
Words that mean nothing:
- leverage, robust, seamless
- transformative, dynamic, unlock
- optimize, empower, actionable
- cutting-edge, game-changer, thought leader
- elevate, maximize, streamlined, impactful
Transitions that appear like clockwork:
- furthermore, moreover, additionally
- consequently, therefore, thus
- “in today's fast-paced world”
- “it is important to note”
- “in conclusion / in summary / to summarize”
The tell-tale structure:
- Sentences that are all roughly the same length
- Paragraphs that could apply to any topic without changing a word
- An opening that could have been written by anyone
- A conclusion that wraps everything up but says nothing new
The clearest test:could this paragraph have been written by anyone, about anything, for any audience? If yes, that is slop.
And here is the thing about slop. Readers feel it even when they can't name it. There is a reason some emails get responses and others don't. A reason some blog posts build an audience and others sit there getting no traffic. Part of that is topic and timing. A big part of it is voice.
Does this sound like someone who actually did the thing they are describing? Does this sound like someone who gives a damn whether I understand?
Generic writing answers those questions with a shrug.
What Human Writing Actually Has
Before you can fix the problem, you need to know what you are aiming for. Three things show up in writing that actually connect.
A point of view. AI avoids opinions. It is trained to be balanced, measured, and unlikely to offend anyone. That instinct produces writing nobody disagrees with and nobody remembers. Human writing takes a position. Even a small one. Not “social media is a useful tool” but “most people use social media to perform, not connect. That's why it feels hollow.”
Specific details. Generic writing lives in abstractions. “Consistency is key.” Human writing lives in specifics. Not “consistency is key” but “if you disappear for three weeks, people forget you exist.” Specifics signal that the writer has actually done the thing.
Rhythm variation. Read AI writing out loud. The sentences tend to be the same length. Medium-long. Grammatically tidy. Human writing varies. Short sentences for emphasis. Then a longer one that builds and carries it somewhere. That variation is what gives writing energy.
The Fastest Fix You Can Make Today
Take the last piece of content you published. Open it. Do a simple find-and-replace pass looking for words from the list above. Count how many you find.
Then rewrite each sentence that contains one. Don't just swap the word for a synonym. Rewrite the whole sentence to say something specific.
Before:Our platform leverages cutting-edge AI to empower creators with actionable insights.
After:The tool watches what's working in your content and tells you what to do more of. Plain English, no dashboard to decode.
Same idea. Completely different impression. The second one tells you something. The first one fills space with confident-sounding noise.
That exercise takes about fifteen minutes. The results are usually eye-opening.
The Read-Aloud Test That Catches Everything Else
After you run the word audit, do this.
Print out your draft or pull it up on screen. Read it out loud at a normal conversational pace. Not performing. Just talking through it like you are explaining it to a friend across a table.
Mark every place where you:
- Trip over a phrase
- Feel the need to take a breath mid-sentence
- Get bored by your own words
- Hear yourself using a word you would never actually say out loud
Those marks are your edit list. This catches things no grammar checker finds.
If reading it out loud makes you want to speed up and skim, your reader is already two paragraphs ahead of you.
The Three Modes for Writing That Sounds Human
Mode 1:Rewrite. Use this when you have a draft that doesn't sound right. The key move:write new sentences instead of editing the old ones. When you edit, you preserve the original structure and rhythm. When you rewrite from scratch, you get something new.
Mode 2:Write From Scratch. Start by writing the main point in one sentence. Then write three to five supporting ideas with one concrete example each. Skip transitions. Write the ideas. The connections will be clearer than you think.
Mode 3:Slop Audit. Run this before you publish anything. One question:does this sound like a real person wrote it? Check for banned words. Check for sentences that all end at the same length. Check for claims with no specific detail. Fix what you find. It takes five minutes.
The One Thing to Remember
Everything in this post comes back to one idea.
Specific beats impressive. Every single time.
Generic writing fails because it trades specificity for the appearance of competence. It reaches for big words and smooth transitions, and in doing so, it loses the one thing that makes writing worth reading. The sense that a real person with real experience is talking to you.
You don't need to be a great writer to fix this. You need to be willing to say the actual thing. Name the specific problem. Give a real example. Tell the reader what actually happened instead of labeling it.
That is the whole game.
Get the Full Guide — Free
Everything in this post comes from a free guide called Stop Sounding Like a Robot. It covers all of this in one place, with before-and-after examples, a quick-reference banned words list, the slop audit checklist, and a system you can use every single time you sit down to write.
No fluff. No lectures about authenticity. Just a clear standard you can apply today.
[ DOWNLOAD STOP SOUNDING LIKE A ROBOT — FREE → ]
Joe Foley
Contributing writer at AI for Ordinary People, passionate about making technology accessible to everyone.
Leave a Reply